We are especially concerned for those who are at high risk of failure because of disadvantages they bring with them to school, and because of the incapacity of the school to respond adequately to those disadvantages. But we are generally concerned with all students who do not earn a high school diploma that represents a level of achievement that prepares them for productive and fulfilling lives after high school.
We cannot address all of the issues that bear on this area of policy concern. We choose to focus on several:
- Assessment and the Achievement Gap
- Teacher Education
- Discipline
- Disproportional Identification for Special Education
- English Language Learners
Read draft of Student Success Committee.
Well, my comment is that student success is not a good thing if it produces knowledge without character (borrowed from Gandhi).
ReplyDeletei totally agree with the section about "Urban Bias in Teacher Education"...i am pursuing my PhD and preparing to teacher pre-service teachers...I see the emphasis on urban reform and no mentioning of rural schools...my question is where is the research to back this up? unless I missed it you did not cite any articles from the field in that section...i think citations would give this very real problem more "legs" and validity when presenting this paper to others in the education field
ReplyDeleteMeasuring student success is more than achievement. In the words of our educational forebears, it is all about life adjustment, in today's terms, working with students so they are healthy, active in the community, working to create transparent politics, contributing to the economy, and respecting the environment -- in short, they are working for sustainability.
ReplyDelete